|
Post by nusrat12 on Nov 22, 2023 11:38:19 GMT 2
the retail context is applicable to a complex sales situation. Let's consider two companies focused on solar energy projects. Let's look at the same comparisons: Organic traffic: Organic traffic - NeoSolar and BlueSol Keywords that generate the most traffic: Keywords - NeoSolar and BlueSol Pages that receive the most traffic: Pages - NeoSolar and BlueSol Here the situation is a little more similar, as the companies have similar results and contexts. Both have similar and relatively diverse traffic volume among the most important words and main pages. But they only have these results because they both effectively invest in content. And if we take a third example, what we have is this: Pages with the most traffic - Solar Energy Traffic concentrated on product and solution pages, right? This European mobile phone number list company has 20 times less traffic than the two mentioned here. And does she have a blog? He has. But look at the content: Content - Solar Energy Blog Market content. Focused on company and industry events. Is this content important? Yes of course. But does it address the user's pain? From the target audience ? No. The consequence? The company does not take advantage of search volume. And with that, there is no traffic. The other two mentioned, which invest in blogs and content, come out ahead. Again, we leave the same reservations as in the B2C scenario. We are talking about website visits and online visibility, not real results or the competence of each company. Whether B2B or B2C, people use Google Note that the comparisons we made are very similar.
|
|